quotes tagged with 'force'

Force has no place where there is need of skill.

Author: Heroditus, Source: UnknownSaved by ImaWriterIII in leadership skill force EDS heroditus 9 years ago[save this] [permalink]

The direct use of force is such a poor solution to any problem, it is generally employed only by small children and large nations.

Author: David Friedman, Source: UnknownSaved by ImaWriterIII in power force politicalpower davidfriedman superpower 9 years ago[save this] [permalink]

Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.

Author: Winston Churchill, Source: UnknownSaved by ImaWriterIII in winstonchurchill courage honor enemy force EDS nevergivein 9 years ago[save this] [permalink]

The state is a force incarnate. Worse, it is the silly parading of force. It never seeks to prevail by persuasion. Whenever it thrusts its finger into anything it does so in the most unfriendly way. Its essence is command and compulsion.

Author: Michael Bakunin, Source: UnknownSaved by ImaWriterIII in tyranny force state compulsion command politicalpower michaelbakunin 9 years ago[save this] [permalink]

In a universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won’t find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice.  The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at the bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no other good.  Nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.  DNA neither knows nor cares.  DNA just is.  And we dance to its music.

Author: Richard Dawkins, Source: as quoted by Ravi Zacharias in "Jesus Among Other Gods," page 114Saved by ImaWriterIII in evil good force universe design what rzquotes absolutes richarddawkins dna 9 years ago[save this] [permalink]

If, from the more wretched parts of the old world, we look at those which are in an advanced stage of improvement, we still find the greedy hand of government thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry, and grasping the spoil of the multitude. Invention is continually exercised, to furnish new pretenses for revenues and taxation. It watches prosperity as its prey and permits none to escape without tribute.

Author: Thomas Paine, Source: Rights of Man, 1791Saved by jrbond in government prosperity greed force tax 10 years ago[save this] [permalink]

For American has a destiny – a destiny to conquer the world – not by force of arms, not by purchase and favor, for these conquests wash away, but by high purpose, by unselfish effort, by uplifting achievement, by a course of Christian living; a conquest that shall leave every nation free to move out to its own destiny; a conquest that shall bring, through the workings of our own example, the blessings of freedom and liberty to every people, without restraint or imposition or compulsion from us; a conquest that shall weld the whole earth together in one great brotherhood in a reign of mutual patience, forbearance, and charity, in a reign of peace to which we shall lead all others by the persuasion of our own righteous example.

Author: J. Reuben Clark, Source: Hickman and Hilllam, "J. Reuben Clark," p. 45Saved by cboyack in politics liberty government freedom america war foreignpolicy example peace force 11 years ago[save this] [permalink]

I am sure that this revelation, brothers and sisters, pertains to this day and to this time. While our attention is attracted to foreign countries where there have been wars and where there are still wars, there are within the very borders of this great republic those who would change our form of government and who would force upon us the same type of government that Lucifer advocated in the councils of heaven.

Author: Joseph L. Wirthlin, Source: http://scriptures.byu.edu/gettalk.php?ID=252Saved by cboyack in constitution conspiracy government agency foreignpolicy force 11 years ago[save this] [permalink]

When a man feels that he has discovered a social order different from the one that has come into being through the natural tendencies of mankind, he must, perforce, in order to have his invention accepted, paint in the most somber colors the results of the order he seeks to abolish. Therefore, the political theorists to whom I refer, while enthusiastically and perhaps exaggeratedly proclaiming the perfectibility of mankind, fall into the strange contradiction of saying that society is constantly deteriorating. According to them, men are today a thousand times more wretched than they were in ancient times, under the feudal system and the yoke of slavery; the world has become a hell. If it were possible to conjure up the Paris of the tenth century, I confidently believe that such a thesis would prove untenable.

Secondly, they are led to condemn even the basic motive power of human actions—I mean self-interest—since it has brought about such a state of affairs. Let us note that man is made in such a way that he seeks pleasure and shuns pain. From this source, I agree, come all the evils of society: war, slavery, monopoly, privilege; but from this source also come all the good things of life, since the satisfaction of wants and the avoidance of suffering are the motives of human action. The question, then, is to determine whether this motivating force which, though individual, is so universal that it becomes a social phenomenon, is not in itself a basic principle of progress.

In any case, do not the social planners realize that this principle, inherent in man's very nature, will follow them into their new orders, and that, once there, it will wreak more serious havoc than in our natural order, in which one individual's excessive claims and self-interest are at least held in bounds by the resistance of all the others? These writers always assume two inadmissible premises: that society, as they conceive it, will be led by infallible men completely immune to the motive of self-interest; and that the masses will allow such men to lead them.

Finally, our social planners do not seem in the least concerned about the implementation of their program. How will they gain acceptance for their systems? How will they persuade all other men simultaneously to give up the basic motive for all their actions: the impulse to satisfy their wants and to avoid suffering? To do so it would be necessary, as Rousseau said, to change the moral and physical nature of man.

To induce all men, simultaneously, to cast off, like an ill-fitting garment, the present social order in which mankind has evolved since its beginning and adopt, instead, a contrived system, becoming docile cogs in the new machine, only two means, it seems to me, are available: force or universal consent.

Either the social planner must have at his disposal force capable of crushing all resistance, so that human beings become mere wax between his fingers to be molded and fashioned to his whim; or he must gain by persuasion consent so complete, so exclusive, so blind even, that the use of force is made unnecessary.

I defy anyone to show me a third means of setting up and putting into operation a phalanstery or any other artificial social order.

Author: Frederic Bastiat, Source: http://www.econlib.org/library/Bastiat/basHar.htmlSaved by cboyack in society action choice economy force economics politician economist 12 years ago[save this] [permalink]

Every action is known by its consequences: What causes benefit is 'good;' what causes harm is 'bad.'

Author: Paul A. Rosenberg, Source: A Lodging of Wayfaring MenSaved by inyucho in politics government freedom force political coercion libertarianism libertarian 12 years ago[save this] [permalink]

« Previous 12 3 4 » Next

tag cloud

Visit the tag cloud to see a visual representation of all the tags saved in Quoty.

popular tags